4.3 Article

Meta-Analysis and Subgroups

Journal

PREVENTION SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 134-143

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-013-0377-7

Keywords

Meta-analysis; Research synthesis; Systematic review; Subgroups; Subgroup analysis; Fixed-effect; Fixed-effects; Random-effects

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_U105285807] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U105285807] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105285807, U105285807] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [DA022799, DA025366, DA019280] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subgroup analysis is the process of comparing a treatment effect for two or more variants of an intervention-to ask, for example, if an intervention's impact is affected by the setting (school versus community), by the delivery agent (outside facilitator versus regular classroom teacher), by the quality of delivery, or if the long-term effect differs from the short-term effect. While large-scale studies often employ subgroup analyses, these analyses cannot generally be performed for small-scale studies, since these typically include a homogeneous population and only one variant of the intervention. This limitation can be bypassed by using meta-analysis. Meta-analysis allows the researcher to compare the treatment effect in different subgroups, even if these subgroups appear in separate studies. We discuss several statistical issues related to this procedure, including the selection of a statistical model and statistical power for the comparison. To illustrate these points, we use the example of a meta-analysis of obesity prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available