4.7 Article

Differences between seedlings and flowers in anti-ROS based heat responses of Arabidopsis plants deficient in cyclic nucleotide gated channel 2

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 288-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.021

Keywords

Heat stress; Cyclic nucleotide gated channel 2 (CNGC2); Growth stage; Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Ascorbate peroxidase 1 (APX1); Multiprotein bridging factor 1c (MBF1c)

Categories

Funding

  1. Sophia University in Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclic nucleotide gated channel 2 (CNGC2) in Arabidopsis has been identified as one of the putative heat sensors which might play a key role in the regulation of heat acclimation. However, it is still not understood how CNGC2 controls heat stress responses during different growth stages. This study aimed to characterize the differences in heat stress responses between seedlings and flowers of Arabidopsis plants deficient in CNGC2. Seedlings of Arabidopsis plants deficient in CNGC2 showed enhanced tolerance to heat stress accompanied by higher accumulation of heat response proteins such as multiprotein bridging factor 1c (MBF1c), ascorbate peroxidases (APXs) and heat shock proteins (HSPs). On the other hand, seed production of these knockout lines was more sensitive to heat stress. In contrast to seedlings, accumulation of MBF1c and APX proteins in flowers of these knockout lines was lower than or almost comparable with that in WT plants under heat stress. In addition, plants deficient in CNGC2 showed dramatically higher accumulation of H2O2 in flowers, but, only slightly higher accumulation in seedlings compared with WT plants. These results suggest that the stage-dependent differences in heat stress response of Arabidopsis regulated by CNGC2 might rely on regulatory mechanisms of APX1-and MBF1c-dependent pathways and H2O2 homeostasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available