4.6 Article

Genome skimming herbarium specimens for DNA barcoding and phylogenomics

Journal

PLANT METHODS
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0300-0

Keywords

Degraded DNA; Herbarium specimens; Genome skimming; Plastid genome; rDNA; DNA barcoding

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science of Technology of China [2013FY112600]
  2. Large-scale Scientific Facilities of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2017-LSF-GBOWS-02]
  3. Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZSSD-011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The world's herbaria contain millions of specimens, collected and named by thousands of researchers, over hundreds of years However, this treasure has remained largely inaccessible to genetic studies, because of both generally limited success of DNA extraction and the challenges associated with PCR-amplifying highly degraded DNA In today's next-generation sequencing world, opportunities and prospects for historical DNA have changed dramatically, as most NGS methods are actually designed for taking short fragmented DNA molecules as templates. Results: As a practical test of routine recovery of rDNA and plastid genome sequences from herbarium specimens, we sequenced 25 herbarium specimens up to 80 years old from 16 different Angiosperm families. Paired-end reads were generated, yielding successful plastid genome assemblies for 23 species and nuclear rDNAs for 24 species, respectively. These data showed that genome skimming can be used to generate genomic information from herbarium specimens as old as 80 years and using as little as 500 pg of degraded starting DNA. Conclusions: The routine plastome sequencing from herbarium specimens is feasible and cost-effective (compare with Sanger sequencing or plastome-enrichment approaches), and can be performed with limited sample destruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available