3.8 Review

Sphingolipids in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems: Pathological implications and potential therapeutic targets

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 75-86

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i4.75

Keywords

Sphingolipids; Sphingosine-1-phosphate; Sphingosine kinase; Ceramide kinase

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS40516]
  2. Veteran's Merit Award
  3. Uehara Foundation
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NHLBI [1P01 HL 68738, R01 HL 090606]
  5. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sphingolipid metabolites ceramide, sphingosine, and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and its enzyme sphingosine kinase (SphK) play an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, inflammation, and cell death. Ceramide and sphingosine usually inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis, while its metabolite S1P phosphorylated by SphK stimulates growth and suppresses apoptosis. Because these metabolites are interconvertible, it has been proposed that it is not the absolute amounts of these metabolites but rather their relative levels that determine cell fate. The relevance of this sphingolipid rheostat and its role in regulating cell fate has been borne out by work in many labs using many different cell types and experimental manipulations. A central finding of these studies is that SphK is a critical regulator of the sphingolipid rheostat, as it not only produces the pro-growth, anti-apoptotic messenger S1P, but also decreases levels of pro-apoptotic ceramide and sphingosine. Activation of bioactive sphingolipid S1P signaling has emerged as a critical protective pathway in response to acute ischemic injury in both cardiac and cerebrovascular disease, and these observations have considerable relevance for future potential therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available