4.7 Article

Co-occurring woody species have diverse hydraulic strategies and mortality rates during an extreme drought

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 576-588

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13121

Keywords

carbon gain; cavitation; climate change; stomatal conductance; water relations

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation, Division of Earth Sciences [EAR-1344703]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2012-00857]
  3. National Science Foundation, Division of Integrative Organismal Systems [IOS-1146746, IOS-1450679, IOS-1549971, IOS-1557906]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1557906] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1344703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From 2011 to 2013, Texas experienced its worst drought in recorded history. This event provided a unique natural experiment to assess species-specific responses to extreme drought and mortality of four co-occurring woody species: Quercus fusiformis, Diospyros texana, Prosopis glandulosa, and Juniperus ashei. We examined hypothesized mechanisms that could promote these species' diverse mortality patterns using postdrought measurements on surviving trees coupled to retrospective process modelling. The species exhibited a wide range of gas exchange responses, hydraulic strategies, and mortality rates. Multiple proposed indices of mortality mechanisms were inconsistent with the observed mortality patterns across species, including measures of the degree of iso/anisohydry, photosynthesis, carbohydrate depletion, and hydraulic safety margins. Large losses of spring and summer whole-tree conductance (driven by belowground losses of conductance) and shallower rooting depths were associated with species that exhibited greater mortality. Based on this retrospective analysis, we suggest that species more vulnerable to drought were more likely to have succumbed to hydraulic failure belowground.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available