4.7 Article

Blood pressure lowering and anti-inflammatory effects of hesperidin in type 2 diabetes; a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial

Journal

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 1073-1079

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6046

Keywords

blood pressure; hesperidin; inflammatory markers; oxidative stress; type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. Nutrition and Metabolic Disease Research Center of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences [NRC-9411]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species under diabetic condition lead to vascular complications and inflammation. This study aimed to examine the effects of hesperidin supplement on blood pressure and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes. In this research, 64 patients were randomly allocated to receive 500mg/day hesperidin or placebo capsules for 6weeks. Data on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC), tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were collected at the baseline and at the end of the study. In the hesperidin group, SBP (122.7 +/- 8.5 vs. 119.0 +/- 7.4; p=.005), mean arterial blood pressure (94.2 +/- 5.5 vs. 91.8 +/- 5.5; p=.009), IL-6 (8.3 +/- 2.1 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.8; p=.001), and hs-CRP (1.9 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.9; p<.000) decreased whereas TAC increased (0.74 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.82 +/- 0.1; p<.000) in comparison to the baseline values. There was a significant difference in mean percent change of SBP, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, serum TAC, and inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-6, and hs-CRP) between hesperidin and control groups following intervention in adjusted models (p<.05). These results suggest that hesperidin may have antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory effects in type 2 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available