4.7 Article

Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to light olefins over non-supported iron catalyst

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 956-963

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60559-2

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; Hydrogenation; Light olefin; Iron catalyst

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB933100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21173174, 20923004, 21033006, 21161130522]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090121110007]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hydrogenation of CO2 to light olefins was investigated over non-supported Fe catalysts. It was found that the addition of alkali metal ions to the Fe catalyst led to significant increases in both the CO2 conversion and the selectivity for olefins. Over K- or Rb-modified catalysts, about 40% CO2 conversion and more than 50% olefin selectivity were obtained. The yield of C-2-C-4 olefins exceeded 10% over these modified catalysts. Catalyst characterization suggested that the formation of iron carbide species was accelerated by the modification of the Fe catalyst with alkali metal ions, and this enhancement may be one of the key reasons for the enhanced catalytic performance. For the K-modified Fe catalysts, K content has a major influence on the catalyst behavior. An increase in the K content from 1 to 5 wt% increased both CO2 conversion and olefin selectivity. However, too high a K content led to a decrease in the activity, probably because of decreases in the surface area and CO2 chemisorption capacity of the catalyst. The presence of an appropriate amount of B in the K-modified Fe catalyst was found to be beneficial to the olefin selectivity, without significantly decreasing the conversion of CO2. (C) 2013, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available