4.6 Editorial Material

Revisiting Sverdrup's critical depth hypothesis Introduction

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1892-1896

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv110

Keywords

bloom onset; light attenuation; mixed layer; mixing depth; phytoplankton; primary production; stratification; turbulence

Funding

  1. NERC [nceo020006] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1341558] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [nceo020006] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Published more than 60 years ago in this Journal, the article in which Sverdrup proposed the concept of critical depth to explain the initiation of the spring bloom in the North Atlantic has accrued an exceptionally large number of citations and continues to be cited more than 50 times per year. The framework provided by Sverdrup has now been applied, adapted, and tested across many aquatic systems worldwide. Datasets have been collected; models have been built on the framework: these studies have generated new insights into phytoplankton dynamics and interesting debates on the relative importance of the various factors responsible for phytoplankton blooms. This article theme set presents some of the most recent efforts to discuss and test Sverdrup's critical depth hypothesis using a diverse set of approaches, ranging from controlled experiments to field observations as well as numerical and analytical models. The set of papers celebrates an elegant and powerful hypothesis that has had long-lasting influence. It is to be expected that it will also stimulate future research, adding even more to our understanding of one of the most fundamental processes in biological oceanography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available