4.7 Article

Investigation of unsteady, hypersonic, laminar separated flows over a double cone geometry using a kinetic approach

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5022598

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research through AFOSR [FA9550-11-1-0129, 2010-06171-01]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF [FA9550-15-1-0387, FA9550-17-1-0115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shock-dominated hypersonic laminar flows over a double cone are investigated using time accurate direct simulation Monte Carlo combined with the residuals algorithm for unit Reynolds numbers gradually increasing from 9.35 x 104 to 3.74 x 10(5) m(-1) at a Mach number of about 16. The main flow features, such as the strong bow-shock, location of the separation shock, the triple point, and the entire laminar separated region, show a time-dependent behavior. Although the separation shock angle is found to be similar for all Re numbers, the effects of Reynolds number on the structure and extent of the separation region are profound. As the Reynolds number is increased, larger pressure values in the under-expanded jet region due to strong shock interactions form more prominent lambda-shocklets in the supersonic region between two contact surfaces. Likewise, the surface parameters, especially on the second cone surface, show a strong dependence on the Reynolds number, with skin friction, pressure, and surface heating rates increasing and velocity slip and temperature jump values decreasing for increasing Re number. A Kelvin-Helmholtz instability arising at the shear layer results in an unsteady flow for the highest Reynolds number. These findings suggest that consideration of experimental measurement times is important when it comes to determining the steady state surface parameters even for a relatively simple double cone geometry at moderately large Reynolds numbers. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available