4.5 Article

Progressive failure analysis of slope with strain-softening behaviour based on strength reduction method

Journal

JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 101-109

Publisher

ZHEJIANG UNIV
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A1200121

Keywords

Shear strength reduction; Strain-softening; Peak strength; Residual strength; Progressive failure analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10972238]
  2. Ministry of Education
  3. Transportation Science and Technology Projects of Hunan Province, China [201003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the strength reduction method and strain-softening model, a method for progressive failure analysis of strain-softening slopes was presented in this paper. The mutation is more pronounced in strain-softening analysis, and the mutation of displacement at slope crest was taken as critical failure criterion. An engineering example was provided to demonstrate the validity of the present method. This method was applied to a cut slope in an industry site. The results are as follows: (1) The factor of safety and the critical slip surface obtained by the present method are between those by peak and residual strength. The analysis with peak strength would lead to non-conservative results, but that with residual strength tends to be overly conservative. (2) The thickness of the shear zone considering strain-softening behaviour is narrower than that with non-softening analysis. (3) The failure of slope is the process of the initiation, propagation and connection of potential failure surface. The strength parameters are mobilized to a non-uniform degree while progressive failure occurs in the slope. (4) The factor of safety increases with the increase of residual shear strain threshold and elastic modulus. The failure mode of slope changes from shallow slip to deep slip. Poisson's ratio and dilation angle have little effect on the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available