4.8 Article

B Meson Anomalies in a Pati-Salam Model within the Randall-Sundrum Background

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.011801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ambizione Grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation [PZ00P2_154834]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_154834] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lepton number as a fourth color is the intriguing theoretical idea of the famous Pati-Salam (PS) model. While in conventional PS models, the symmetry breaking scale and the mass of the resulting vector leptoquark are stringently constrained by K-L -> mu e and K -> pi mu e, the scale can be lowered to a few TeV by adding vectorlike fermions. Furthermore, in this case, the intriguing hints for lepton flavor universality violation in b -> s mu vertical bar mu(-) and b -> c tau upsilon processes can be addressed. Such a setup is naturally achieved by implementing the PS gauge group in the five-dimensional Randall-Sundrum background. The PS symmetry is broken by boundary conditions on the fifth dimension, and the resulting massive vector leptoquark automatically has the same mass scale as the vectorlike fermions and all other resonances. We consider the phenomenology of this model in the context of the hints for lepton flavor universality violation in semileptonic B decays. Assuming flavor alignment in the down sector, we find that in b -> sl(+)l(-), the observed deviations from the standard model predictions [including R(K) and R(K*)] can be explained with natural values for the free parameters of the model. Even though we find sizable effects in R(D), R(D*), and R(J/Psi) , one cannot account for the current central values in the constrained setup of our minimal model due to the stringent constraints from D - (D) over bar mixing and tau -> 3 mu.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available