4.8 Article

Decoherence-Free Interaction between Giant Atoms in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.140404

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Overseas Researchers [P15750]
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. RIKEN iTHES Project
  5. MURI Center for Dynamic Magneto-Optics via the AFOSR [FA9550-14-10040]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI)
  7. JSPS-RFBR [17-52-50023]
  8. CREST [JPMJCR1676]
  9. RIKEN-AIST Challenge Research program
  10. Sir John Templeton Foundation
  11. IMPACT program of JST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In quantum-optics experiments with both natural and artificial atoms, the atoms are usually small enough that they can be approximated as pointlike compared to the wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation with which they interact. However, superconducting qubits coupled to a meandering transmission line, or to surface acoustic waves, can realize giant artificial atoms that couple to a bosonic field at several points which are wavelengths apart. Here, we study setups with multiple giant atoms coupled at multiple points to a one-dimensional (1D) waveguide. We show that the giant atoms can be protected from decohering through the waveguide, but still have exchange interactions mediated by the waveguide. Unlike in decoherence-free subspaces, here the entire multiatom Hilbert space (2(N) states for N atoms) is protected from decoherence. This is not possible with small atoms. We further show how this decoherence-free interaction can be designed in setups with multiple atoms to implement, e.g., a 1D chain of atoms with nearest-neighbor couplings or a collection of atoms with all-to-all connectivity. This may have important applications in quantum simulation and quantum computing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available