4.8 Article

Search for Tensor, Vector, and Scalar Polarizations in the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.201102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) of the United Kingdom
  3. Max-Planck-Society (MPS)
  4. State of Niedersachsen, Germany
  5. Australian Research Council
  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  7. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  8. Department of Science and Technology, India
  9. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  10. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  11. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion
  12. Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d'Innovacio, Recerca i Turisme
  13. Conselleria d'Educacio i Universitat del Govern de les Illes Balears
  14. Conselleria d'Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport de la Generalitat Valenciana
  15. National Science Centre of Poland
  16. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  17. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  18. Russian Science Foundation
  19. European Commission
  20. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  21. Royal Society
  22. Scottish Funding Council
  23. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  24. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  25. Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  26. Paris Ile-de-France Region
  27. National Research, Development and Innovation Office Hungary (NKFI)
  28. National Research Foundation of Korea
  29. Industry Canada
  30. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  31. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canada
  32. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  33. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations, and Communications
  34. International Center for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTP-SAIFR)
  35. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  36. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  37. Leverhulme Trust
  38. Research Corporation
  39. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  40. Kavli Foundation
  41. STFC [ST/K000845/1, PPA/G/S/2002/00652, 1802894, ST/M005844/1, 1654298, ST/K005014/1, ST/N005406/1, ST/J00166X/1, ST/N005430/1, 1653089, ST/N000072/1, ST/R00045X/1, ST/L000954/1, 2142081, ST/N005406/2, ST/K005014/2, ST/N000633/1, ST/H002006/1, ST/I006269/1, ST/P000258/1, 1802888, Gravitational Waves, ST/N005422/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  42. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1607673] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  43. Division Of Physics [1404139, 1607585] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detection of gravitational waves with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo has enabled novel tests of general relativity, including direct study of the polarization of gravitational waves. While general relativity allows for only two tensor gravitational-wave polarizations, general metric theories can additionally predict two vector and two scalar polarizations. The polarization of gravitational waves is encoded in the spectral shape of the stochastic gravitational-wave background, formed by the superposition of cosmological and individually unresolved astrophysical sources. Using data recorded by Advanced LIGO during its first observing run, we search for a stochastic background of genetically polarized gravitational waves. We find no evidence for a background of any polarization, and place the first direct bounds on the contributions of vector and scalar polarizations to the stochastic background. Under log-uniform priors for the energy in each polarization, we limit the energy densities of tensor, vector, and scalar modes at 95% credibility to Omega(T)(0) < 5.58 x 10(-8), Omega(V)(0) < 6.35 x 10(-8), and Omega(S)(0) < 1.08 x 10(-7) at a reference frequency f(0) = 25 Hz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available