4.6 Article

Evolution of the topological properties of two-dimensional group IVA materials and device design

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 2296-2307

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp07420d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Southern University of Science and Technology
  2. Shenzhen Peacock Plan
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11681240276, 11674152, 11604142]
  4. Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20150630145302225, JCYJ20170412152620376, ZDSYS201703031659262]
  5. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2016ZT06D348]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional group IVA materials (graphene, silicene, germanene, stanene, and plumbene) are promising candidates for realization of the quantum spin Hall effect and for future device applications. We employ density functional theory, tight-binding models, and a Green's function method to systematically investigate their topological properties. From graphene to plumbene, the strength of spin-orbit coupling and the bulk gap increases with increasing atomic mass, and plumbene, as a normal insulator, is totally different from the other four materials, whose ground states are topological insulators. Through detailed analyses of orbital character weights and the evolution of low-energy states around the Gamma point, we explain why plumbene is so different. Our quantum transport calculations also indicate that there exist electronic transport channels along edges within the bulk gap of topological insulators. By investigating the effects of external fields on the electronic structures of silicene, germanene, and stanene, we reveal a rich phase diagram and propose two filters with nearly 100% spin polarization. In addition, we present a theoretical design for a spin twister, based on curved two-dimensional topological insulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available