4.4 Article

Exploration of temporal stability and prognostic power of radiomic features based on electronic portal imaging device images

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.037

Keywords

Temporal stability; Radiomic feature; EPID image; Prognostic prediction

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16J04082]
  2. Program for Supporting Educations and Researches on Mathematics and Data Science in Kyushu University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J04082] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We aimed to explore the temporal stability of radiomic features in the presence of tumor motion and the prognostic powers of temporally stable features. Methods: We selected single fraction dynamic electronic portal imaging device (EPID) (n = 275 frames) and static digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of 11 lung cancer patients, who received stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) under free breathing. Forty-seven statistical radiomic features, which consisted of 14 histogram-based features and 33 texture features derived from the graylevel co-occurrence and graylevel run-length matrices, were computed. The temporal stability was assessed by using a multiplication of the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between features derived from the EPID and DRR images at three quantization levels. The prognostic powers of the features were investigated using a different database of lung cancer patients (n = 221) based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Fifteen radiomic features were found to be temporally stable for various quantization levels. Among these features, seven features have shown potentials for prognostic prediction in lung cancer patients. Conclusions: This study suggests a novel approach to select temporally stable radiomic features, which could hold prognostic powers in lung cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available