Journal
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 373, Issue 1754, Pages -Publisher
ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0258
Keywords
eusociality; undertaking behaviour; necrophoresis; burial; cannibalism; behavioural plasticity
Categories
Funding
- USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [1012579960, 1004654, KY008071]
- Women & Science Postdoctoral Fellowship
- project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station [18-08-20]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Eusocial insects frequently face death of colony members as a consequence of living in large groups where the success of the colony is not dependent on the fate of the individual. Whereas death of conspecifics commonly triggers aversion in many group-living species due to risk of pathogens, eusocial insects perform cooperative corpse management. The causes and social context of the death, as well as feeding and nesting ecology of the species, influence the way that corpses are treated. The corpse itself releases cues that dictate the colony's response. As a result, social insects exhibit behavioural responses that promote disease resistance, colony defence and nutrient recycling. Corpse management represents a unique adaption that enhances colony success, and is another factor that has enabled eusocial insects to be so successful. In this review, we summarize the causes of death, the sensory detection of death and corpse management strategies of social insects. In addition, we provide insights into the evolution of behavioural response to the dead and the ecological relevance of corpse management. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary thanatology: impacts of the dead on the living in humans and other animals'.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available