4.6 Editorial Material

Metacognition and abstract concepts

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0133

Keywords

abstract concepts; grounding; linguistic labels; deference; metacognition; philosophy

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council (MetCogCon grant) [681422]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [681422] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of how concepts can refer to or be about the non-mental world is particularly puzzling for abstract concepts. There is growing evidence that many characteristics beyond the perceptual are involved in grounding different kinds of abstract concept. A resource that has been suggested, but little explored, is introspection. This paper develops that suggestion by focusing specifically on metacognition-on the thoughts and feelings that thinkers have about a concept. One example of metacognition about concepts is the judgement that we should defer to others in how a given concept is used. Another example is our internal assessment of which concepts are dependable and useful, and which less so. Metacognition of this kind may be especially important for grounding abstract concepts. This article is part of the theme issue 'Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available