4.7 Review

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs)

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 60-79

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.07.016

Keywords

Apixaban; Betrixaban; Dabigatran etexilate; Edoxaban; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. BMS
  3. Sankyo
  4. EDRA S.p.A.
  5. European Union [675527]
  6. MIUR Progetto Eccellenza
  7. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [675527] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of warfarin, the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant, is being questioned by clinicians worldwide due to warfarin several limitations (a limited therapeutic window and significant variability in dose response among individuals, in addition to a potential for drug-drug interactions). Therefore, the need for non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with a rapid onset of antithrombotic effects and a predictable pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile led to the approval of five new drugs: the direct factor Xa (F-Xa) inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban (newly approved by FDA) and the direct thrombin (factor-Ha) inhibitor dabigatran etexilate. The advantages of NOACs over warfarin are a fixed-dosage, the absence of the need for drug monitoring for changes in anti-coagulation and fewer clinically significant PK and PD drug-drug interactions. NOACs exposure will likely be increased by the administration of strong Pglycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-inhibitors and may increase the risk of bleeds. On the contrary, P-gp inducers could significantly decrease the NOACs plasma concentration with an associated reduction in their anticoagulant effects. This manuscript gives an overview of NOACs PK profiles and their drug-drug interactions potential. This is meant to be of help to physicians in choosing the best therapeutic approach for their patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available