4.5 Article

'In Vitro', 'In Vivo' and 'In Silico' Investigation of the Anticancer Effectiveness of Oxygen-Loaded Chitosan-Shelled Nanodroplets as Potential Drug Vector

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2371-z

Keywords

antitumor nanodevice; breast cancer; chitosan nanodroplet; nanocarrier; oxygen

Funding

  1. Compagnia di San Paolo (Ateneo-San Paolo 2011) [ORTO11CE8R]
  2. Universita di Torino
  3. Universita degli Studi di Torino
  4. Azienda Sanitaria Locale-19 (ASL-19)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Chitosan-shelled/decafluoropentane-cored oxygen-loaded nanodroplets (OLN) are a new class of nanodevices to effectively deliver anti-cancer drugs to tumoral cells. This study investigated their antitumoral effects 'per se', using a mathematical model validated on experimental data. Methods OLN were prepared and characterized either in vitro or in vivo. TUBO cells, established from a lobular carcinoma of a BALB-neuT mouse, were investigated following 48 h of incubation in the absence/presence of different concentrations of OLN. OLN internalization, cell viability, necrosis, apoptosis, cell cycle and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production were checked as described in the Method section. In vivo tumor growth was evaluated after subcutaneous transplant in BALB/c mice of TUBO cells either without treatment or after 24 h incubation with 10% v/v OLN. Results OLN showed sizes of about 350 nm and a positive surface charge (45 mV). Dose-dependent TUBO cell death through ROS-triggered apoptosis following OLN internalization was detected. A mathematical model predicting the effects of OLN uptake was validated on both in vitro and in vivo results. Conclusions Due to their intrinsic toxicity OLN might be considered an adjuvant tool suitable to deliver their therapeutic cargo intracellularly and may be proposed as promising combined delivery system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available