4.7 Article

Horizontal transmission of Paranosema locustae (Microsporidia) in grasshopper populations via predatory natural enemies

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages 2589-2593

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5047

Keywords

grasshopper; entomopathogens; microbial control; microsporidia

Funding

  1. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFR30290]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Paranosema locustae Canning, 1953 (Microsporidia) provides effective control of grasshoppers. Horizontal transmission of P. locustae is known to occur, and evidence for the mechanism of this transmission via predatory natural enemies has been found. We conducted a 3-year laboratory and field study to assess the potential impact of feces from both grasshoppers Locusta migratoria L. and their natural enemies on the persistence of P. locustae. RESULTS: We found that P. locustae persisted among grasshopper populations in treated areas and in adjacent untreated areas for up to 2 years, and the density of grasshoppers decreased in both areas. We showed that healthy grasshoppers could be infected by eating food contaminated by feces from their natural enemies. Grasshopper predators retained a large number of spores acquired from eating grasshoppers infected with P. locustae. Spores in the feces of the main natural enemy, the beetle Pterostichus gebleri Dejean 1828, in the treated area showed clear viability CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that predatory natural enemies are important vectors for this microsporidian disease, and suggest that sustainable transmission and continuing population suppression might be achieved by horizontal transmission via natural enemies, which should be maximized to increase the effectiveness of P. locustae. (C) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available