4.1 Article

Effect of Low-Versus High-Intensity Exercise Training on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Endothelial Dysfunction in Adolescents With Obesity: A 6-Month Randomized Exercise Intervention Study

Journal

PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 98-107

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/pes.2017-0067

Keywords

aerobic exercise; inflammatory biomarkers; adiposity; teenagers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate the effects of a low-versus high-intensity aerobic training on biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in adolescents with obesity. Methods: Sixty-two adolescents with obesity [age = 15 (14) y, body mass index = 34.87 (4.22) kg.m(-2)] were randomized to receive either a high-intensity training (HIT, n = 31) or a low-intensity training (LIT, n = 31) for 24 weeks. All participants also received nutritional, psychological, and clinical counseling. Leptin, total and subtype leukocyte counts, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, myeloperoxidase, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were obtained at baseline and after 24 weeks. Results: HIT reduced neutrophils [from 4.4 (1.9) to 3.6 (1.3) mu L-1 x 10(3); P=.01] and monocytes [from 7.2 (2.5) to 5.2 (1.8) mu L-1 x 10(2); P<.01], but LIT increased neutrophils [from 4.5 (1.7) to 5.2 (3.3) mu L-1 x 10(3); P=.01]. Although tumor necrosis factor-alpha increased in LIT [from 13.3 (7.5) to 17.7 (10.8) pg.mL(-1); P=.01], it decreased in HIT [from 12.4 (7.5) to 11.3 (6.2) pg.mL(-1); P=.01]. No changes in leukocyte counts, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and homeostasis assessment model for insulin resistance were observed. Conclusions: Both HIT and LIT improved the inflammatory profile. The study, however, indicated that the number of biomarkers and the magnitude of changes were higher in the HIT compared with LIT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available