Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 939-946Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612464058
Keywords
explanation; illusion of explanatory depth; political psychology; attitudes; polarization; extremism; moderation; public policy; causal models; mechanism; causality; policymaking; decision making; judgment
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
People often hold extreme political attitudes about complex policies. We hypothesized that people typically know less about such policies than they think they do (the illusion of explanatory depth) and that polarized attitudes are enabled by simplistic causal models. Asking people to explain policies in detail both undermined the illusion of explanatory depth and led to attitudes that were more moderate (Experiments 1 and 2). Although these effects occurred when people were asked to generate a mechanistic explanation, they did not occur when people were instead asked to enumerate reasons for their policy preferences (Experiment 2). Finally, generating mechanistic explanations reduced donations to relevant political advocacy groups (Experiment 3). The evidence suggests that people's mistaken sense that they understand the causal processes underlying policies contributes to political polarization.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available