4.7 Article

Polyp detection during colonoscopy using a regression-based convolutional neural network with a tracker

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 209-219

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.05.026

Keywords

Smart cancer screening; Therapeutic endoscopy; Endoscopic Informatics; Body Sensor Network; Deep Learning; Health Informatics

Funding

  1. General Research Fund [GRF/14202417]
  2. Innovation and Technology Fund [ITF/337/16FP]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA206100] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A computer-aided detection (CAD) tool for locating and detecting polyps can help reduce the chance of missing polyps during colonoscopy. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art algorithms were either computationally complex or suffered from low sensitivity and therefore unsuitable to be used in real clinical setting. In this paper, a novel regression-based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) pipeline is presented for polyp detection during colonoscopy. The proposed pipeline was constructed in two parts: 1) to learn the spatial features of colorectal polyps, a fast object detection algorithm named ResYOLO was pre-trained with a large non-medical image database and further fine-tuned with colonoscopic images extracted from videos; and 2) temporal information was incorporated via a tracker named Efficient Convolution Operators (ECO) for refining the detection results given by ResYOLO. Evaluated on 17,574 frames extracted from 18 endoscopic videos of the AsuMayoDB, the proposed method was able to detect frames with polyps with a precision of 88.6%, recall of 71.6% and processing speed of 6.5 frames per second, i.e. the method can accurately locate polyps in more frames and at a faster speed compared to existing methods. In conclusion, the proposed method has great potential to be used to assist endoscopists in tracking polyps during colonoscopy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available