4.7 Article

Revisiting multiple instance neural networks

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 15-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.026

Keywords

Multiple instance learning; Neural networks; Deep learning; End-to-end learning

Funding

  1. Young Elite Sponsorship Program by CAST [YESS 20150077]
  2. CCF-Tencent Open Research Fund
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61503145, 61573160, 61572207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Of late, neural networks and Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) are both attractive topics in the research areas related to Artificial Intelligence. Deep neural networks have achieved great successes in supervised learning problems, and MIL as a typical weakly-supervised learning method is effective for many applications in computer vision, biometrics, natural language processing, and so on. In this article, we revisit Multiple Instance Neural Networks (MINNs) that the neural networks aim at solving the MIL problems. The MINNs perform MIL in an end-to-end manner, which take bags with a various number of instances as input and directly output the labels of bags. All of the parameters in a MINN can be optimized via back-propagation. Besides revisiting the old MINNs, we propose a new type of MINN to learn bag representations, which is different from the existing MINNs that focus on estimating instance label. In addition, recent tricks developed in deep learning have been studied in MINNs; we find deep supervision is effective for learning better bag representations. In the experiments, the proposed MINNs achieve state-of-the-art or competitive performance on several MIL benchmarks. Moreover, it is extremely fast for both testing and training, for example, it takes only 0.0003 s to predict a bag and a few seconds to train on MIL datasets on a moderate CPU. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available