4.5 Article

Feature selection via Levy Antlion optimization

Journal

PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 857-876

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-018-0695-2

Keywords

Levy Antlion optimization; Levy flight; Feature selection; Bio-inspired optimization

Funding

  1. IPRO-COM Marie Curie initial training network through the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/under REA grant [316555]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a modification of the newly proposed antlion optimization (ALO) is introduced and applied to feature selection relied on the Levy flights. ALO method is one of the encouraging swarm intelligence algorithms which make use of random walking to perform the exploration and exploitation operations. Random walks basedon uniform distribution is responsible for premature convergence and stagnation. A Levy flight random walk is suggested as a permutation for performing a local search. Levy random walking grants the optimization ability to generate several solutions that are apart from existing solutions and furthermore enables it to escape from local minima and much efficient in examining large search area. The proposed Levy antlion optimization (LALO) algorithm is applied in a wrapper-based mode to select optimal feature combination thatmaximizing classification accuracy while minimizing the number of selected features. LALO algorithm is applied on 21 different benchmark datasets against genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and the native ALOmethods. Different initialization methods and several evaluation criteria are employed to assess algorithm diversification and intensification of the optimization algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate the significant improvement in the proposed LALO over the native ALO and many well-known methods used in feature selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available