4.5 Article

Affective communication during bad news consultation. Effect on analogue patients' heart rate variability and recall

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages 1892-1899

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.009

Keywords

Empathy; Heart rate variability; Communication; Cancer; Analogue patients; Bad news communication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of physicians' supportive communication on analogue patients' (APs) heart rate variability (HRV) and recall, while watching a video of palliative treatment being explained to a female patient. Methods: Sixty healthy women, acting as APs, were randomly assigned to watch one of two versions (standard vs. affective) of a scripted video-vignette of a bad news consultation to a female patient. The physician's communication differed only in the delivery of four supportive comments. Empathy, support and engagement perception were assessed by three questions. APs' HR was recorded during video-observation and recall was assessed immediately after. HRV was determined through measures defined in time and frequency domains. Results: Data of 54 APs (27 + 27) were included. The group with supportive communication perceived the physician as more empathic and supportive. Intra-and Inter-group comparisons suggested a greater sense of stress in the standard communication group. Recall did not differ in the two groups. Conclusion and practice implications: Findings show that the use of supportive expressions contribute to the perception of the physician as more empathic, potentially buffer patients' arousal after a bad news announcement, but does not confirm a positive impact on general recall. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available