4.5 Review

Review: Optimization methods for groundwater modeling and management

Journal

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1051-1065

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-015-1260-3

Keywords

Optimization; Groundwater management; Inverse modeling

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-1314422]
  2. AECOM endowment
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1314422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences [1314422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimization methods have been used in groundwater modeling as well as for the planning and management of groundwater systems. This paper reviews and evaluates the various optimization methods that have been used for solving the inverse problem of parameter identification (estimation), experimental design, and groundwater planning and management. Various model selection criteria are discussed, as well as criteria used for model discrimination. The inverse problem of parameter identification concerns the optimal determination of model parameters using water-level observations. In general, the optimal experimental design seeks to find sampling strategies for the purpose of estimating the unknown model parameters. A typical objective of optimal conjunctive-use planning of surface water and groundwater is to minimize the operational costs of meeting water demand. The optimization methods include mathematical programming techniques such as linear programming, quadratic programming, dynamic programming, stochastic programming, nonlinear programming, and the global search algorithms such as genetic algorithms, simulated annealing, and tabu search. Emphasis is placed on groundwater flow problems as opposed to contaminant transport problems. A typical two-dimensional groundwater flow problem is used to explain the basic formulations and algorithms that have been used to solve the formulated optimization problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available