4.1 Article

The Latent Structure of Medically Unexplained Symptoms and Its Relation to Functional Somatic Syndromes

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 172-183

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12529-012-9237-2

Keywords

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS); Somatization; Somatoform disorders; Functional somatic syndromes; Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Confirmatory factor analysis; Nested factor model; Bifactor model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medically unexplained symptoms are the hallmark of somatoform disorders and functional somatic syndromes. Although medically unexplained symptoms represent a common phenomenon both in the general population as well as in medical settings, the exact latent structure of somatic symptoms remains largely unclear. We examined the latent structure of medically unexplained symptoms by means of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) questionnaire (i.e., a popular symptom checklist) and provide support for the construct validity of our model. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis in a general population sample (study 1; N = 414) and in a sample of primary care patients (study 2; N = 308). We compared four different latent structure models of medically unexplained symptoms: a general factor model, a correlated group factor model, a hierarchical model, and a bifactor model. In study 1, a bifactor model with one general factor and four independent specific symptom factors (i.e., gastrointestinal, pain, fatigue, and cardiopulmonary symptoms) showed the best model fit. This bifactor model was confirmed in the primary care sample (study 2). Additionally, the model explained 59 % of the variance of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this structural equation model, both the general factor (14 %) as well as the gastrointestinal symptom factor (42 %) significantly predicted the IBS. The findings of both studies help to clarify the latent structure of somatic symptoms in the PHQ-15. The bifactor model outperformed alternative models and demonstrated external validity in predicting IBS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available