4.3 Article

Effects of temperature and soil moisture on gross nitrification and denitrification rates of a Chinese lowland paddy field soil

Journal

PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 687-698

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-018-0660-0

Keywords

Paddy soils; N nitrification; N denitrification; Soil moisture; Soil temperature

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51439006, 51379150]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydro-power Engineering at the Wuhan University [2017NSG01]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  4. Henry Kroeger Memorial Graduate Scholarship
  5. University of Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation is widely adopted to save water in rice production. AWD practice shifts lowland paddy fields from being continuously anaerobic to being alternately anaerobic and aerobic, thus affecting nitrogen (N) transformations in paddy field soils. Using the barometric process separation technique, a large number of soil cores sampled from lowland paddy field soil profiles were measured for gross nitrification and denitrification rates under different temperature and soil moisture conditions. The gross nitrification and denitrification rates vary with rice growth stages and range between 1.18-30.8 and 0.65-13.54mgNm(-3)h(-1), respectively. Results indicate that both gross nitrification and denitrification rates increased with the increase in temperature in all three studied soil layers. Gross nitrification rates significantly decrease with increasing soil moisture while denitrification rates increase, and different soil layers demonstrated different rates of variation to the increase in soil moisture. Gross nitrification rates in the cultivated horizon layer decreased more sharply with the increase in soil moisture. High soil water content is favorable to denitrification of all soil layers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available