4.5 Article

Effects of Ligand, Metal, and Solvation on the Structure and Stability of Contact Ion Pairs Relevant to Olefin Polymerization Catalyzed by Rare-Earth-Metal Complexes: A DFT Study

Journal

ORGANOMETALLICS
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 882-890

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00857

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [21174023, 21429201, 21674014]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT2016TB08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A full account of theoretical analyses at the DFT level has been reported, focusing on the formation and reactivity of a family of cationic [R-(CH2)(n)-Py-Sc(CH2SiMe3)](+) catalysts and the effects of counterion and solvation. Two sets of model systems have been considered: (a) structures having identical bridging unit (n = 1) but having varying cyclopentadienyl groups (R = Cp' (1), R = Ind (2), and R = Flu (3)) and (b) systems with the identical cyclopentadienyl moiety (Flu) but with varying bridging groups (n = 1 (3), n = 0 (4), and n = 2 (5)). For complex 3, various metal ions (Sc, Y, La, Pr, Nd, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, and Lu) were considered to investigate the effect of central metals on the contact ion pairs (CIP). The formation and separation of CIP were found to be influenced by the steric hindrance of the ligand, the electron-donating ability of the cyclopentadienyl group, and the rare-earth metal ion radius. The separation enthalpy of the CIPs decreases with increasing dielectronic constant of the solvent. The solvation hardly affects the energy barrier for styrene insertion into the Sc-C17H9 bond of the CIP [(Flu-CH2-Py)Sc-(C17H19)] [B(C6F5)(4)]. A bulkier and more electron donating ancillary ligand, a smaller ion radius of the rare-earth metal, and a greater polarity of the solvent are more beneficial to the separation of CIP and thus to the monomer coordination, which could contribute to the improvement of polymerization activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available