4.6 Article

Molecular classification of autofluorescence excision margins in oral potentially malignant disorders

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 732-740

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12818

Keywords

autofluorescence; excision margins; gene expression profiling; oral potentially malignant disorders; RNA sequencing; VELscope

Funding

  1. Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Queensland Government
  2. Queensland Government Smart Futures Co-Investment Fund
  3. Cancer Australia
  4. Australian Dental Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo define molecular differences between autofluorescence and white light defined excision margins in oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) using transcriptome expression profiles. Materials and methodsExcisional biopsy specimens were taken from 11 patients at three different sites for each lesion: centre, white light margin and autofluorescence margin. The lesions were diagnosed histopathologically as oral epithelial dysplasia, oral lichenoid dysplasia, oral lichen planus or other. Transcriptome analysis was performed by RNA sequencing, hierarchical clustering, differential expression and biological pathway analysis. ResultsFor hierarchical clustering, the samples broadly clustered according to histology rather than the margins with lichenoid samples clustering together. Differential expression analysis showed that independent of histology, there was greater molecular dysregulation between the lesion centre and autofluorescence margin compared to the lesion centre and white light margin. Furthermore, the autofluorescence and white light margins were molecularly distinct, indicating the white light margins harboured abnormality. ConclusionOur results indicate that the molecular profile of OPMD changes with divergence away from the centre of the lesion, and that autofluorescence determined margins are superior to the white light margin in achieving a clear molecular margin when excising an OPMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available