4.7 Article

Biological and clinical characteristics of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 in the longitudinal RISCA study: analysis of baseline data

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 650-658

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70104-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [674N-RISCA/2010-2014, 674N-RISCA/2010, N401 097536, 0975/B/P01/2009/36 2009-2012]
  2. Ministry of Regional Development Operating Programme Innovative Economy [POIG 01.01.02.14-051/09/01]
  3. Norwegian Financial Mechanism [PL0076]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCH0754/4-1, SCHO754/5-1]
  5. German Research Council (BMBF) [01GM0644]
  6. mitoNET [01GM0864]
  7. E-RARE [01GM0807]
  8. RISCA [01GM0820]
  9. HSP-Selbsthilfegruppe Deutschland eV
  10. Movement Disorder Society
  11. Fortune-Programm (University of Tubingen) [1890-0-0]
  12. German Research Foundation (DFG) [TI 239/9-1
  13. 10-1]
  14. European Union
  15. Bernd Fink Foundation
  16. German Heredoataxia Foundation
  17. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are autosomal, dominantly inherited, fully penetrant neurodegenerative diseases. Our aim was to study the preclinical stage of the most common SCAs: SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, and SCA6. Methods Between Sept 13,2008, and Dec 1,2011, offspring or siblings of patients with SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, or SCA6 were enrolled into a prospective, longitudinal observational study at 14 European centres. To be eligible for indusion in our study, individuals had to have no ataxia and be aged 18-50 years if directly related to individuals with SCA1, SCA2, or SCA3, or 35-70 years if directly related to individuals with SCA6. We did anonymous genetic testing to identify mutation carriers. We assessed participants with clinical scales, questionnaires, and performance-based coordination tests. In eight of the 14 centres, participants underwent MRI. We analysed relations between outcome variables and time from onset (defined as the difference between present age and estimated age at ataxia onset). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01037777. Findings 276 participants met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate, of whom 12 (4%) were excluded from final analysis because DNA samples were missing or genotyping failed. Estimated time from onset was -9 years (IQR -13 to -6) in 50 carriers of the SCA1 mutation, -12 years (-15 to -9) in 31 SCA2 mutation carriers, -8 years (-11 to -6) in 26 SCA3 mutation carriers, and -18 years (-22 to -16) in 16 SCA6 mutation carriers. Compared with non-carriers of each mutation, SCA1 mutation carriers had higher median scores on the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA; 0-5 [IQR 0-1-01 vs 0 [0-0]; p=0.0052), as did SCA2 mutation carriers (0.5 [0-2.0] vs 0 [0-0.5]; p=0.0037). S CA2 mutation carriers had lower SCA functional index scores than did non-carriers (-0.43 [-0.91 to -0.07] vs 0.09 [-0.30 to 0-56]; p=0.0007). SCA2 mutation carriers had worse composite cerebellar functional scores than did their non-carrier counterparts (0.915 [0.861-0.959] vs 0-849 [0-764-0-886]; p=0-0039). All other differences between carriers and non-carriers were non-significant. In SCA1 and SCA2 mutation carriers, SARA scores were increased in participants who were closer to the estimated age at onset (SCA1: r=0.36, p=0-0112; SCA2: r=0.50, p=0.0038). 83 individuals (30%) underwent MRI. Voxel-based morphometry showed grey-matter loss in the brainstem and cerebellum in SCA1 and SCA2 mutation carriers, and normalised brainstem volume was lower in SCA2 mutation carriers (median 0.015, range 0.012-0.016) than in non-carriers (0.019, 0.017-0.021; p=0-0107). Interpretation Preclinical SCA1 and SCA2 mutation carriers seem to have mild coordination deficits and abnormalities in the brain that are more common in carriers who are doser to the estimated onset of ataxia. Individuals in this early disease stage could be targeted in future preventive trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available