4.3 Article

Self-regulation and autonomy in problem- and project-based learning environments

Journal

ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 109-122

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1469787413481132

Keywords

Autonomy; problem-based learning; project-based learning; self-regulated learning

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EEC-0835901, EEC-0835889, EEC-0835911, EEC-0835884]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers [0936511, 0835901, 0835884] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigations of the relationships between contexts in which learning occurs and students' behaviours, cognitions and motivations may further our understanding of how instruction is related to students' development as self-regulated learners. In this study, student self-regulated learning strategies in problem-based learning and project-based learning environments were examined to determine whether student self-regulation outcomes differed depending on the instructional design. Quantitative results showed that student motivations and behaviours were not statistically different in the two settings. Differences in cognitions associated with self-regulated learning were, however, observed in the two settings, with students in the project-based environments reporting higher levels of elaboration, critical thinking and metacognition. In addition, students in the project-based courses reported higher perceived autonomy support, or the degree to which they perceived their instructors provided them with supportive opportunities to act and think independently compared to students in the problem-based courses. These findings indicate that different non-traditional student-centred learning environments may support different outcomes related to self-regulated learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available