4.6 Article

Coexistence of rectangular and Gaussian-shape noise-like pulses in a figure-eight fiber laser

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages 17804-17813

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.017804

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61378036, 11304101, 11474108, 61307058]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201607010245]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2014A030306019]
  4. Program for the Outstanding Innovative Young Talents of Guangdong Province [2014TQ01X220]
  5. Open Fund of the Guangdong Engineering Technology Research and Development Center of Special Optical Fiber Materials and Devices (South China University of Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We experimentally report the coexistence of the rectangular noise-like pulse (NLP) and the Gaussian-shape NLP in a figure-eight fiber laser. Benefiting from the strengthened nonlinear effect of a segment of highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF) in the cavity, the coexistent NLPs with various patterns, i.e. one rectangular pulse with one Gaussian-shape pulse, one rectangular pulse with two Gaussian-shape pulses and two rectangular pulses with one Gaussian-shape pulse, are formed depending on the cavity parameters setting. In particular, the evolution of these coexistent NLPs properties with pump power is investigated. It is found that the duration of the rectangular pulse always increases, while the Gaussian-shape pulse has almost no changes with the increasing pump power. The achieved results demonstrated for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, the pulses with different shapes can coexist under the NLP regime, which contributes to further understanding the fundamental characteristics of the NLPs and multiple pulses. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available