4.5 Article

TRIO loss of function is associated with mild intellectual disability and affects dendritic branching and synapse function

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 892-902

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv618

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [912-12-109, 916-14-043]
  2. European research council (ERC) [DENOVO 281964]
  3. 'Donders Center for Neuroscience fellowship award of the Radboudumc'
  4. 'FP7-Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant' [277091]
  5. Jerome Lejeune Foundation
  6. NIH by National Institutes for Mental Health [1R01MH101221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we marked TRIO for the first time as a candidate gene for intellectual disability (ID). Across diverse vertebrate species, TRIO is a well-conserved Rho GTPase regulator that is highly expressed in the developing brain. However, little is known about the specific events regulated by TRIO during brain development and its clinical impact in humans when mutated. Routine clinical diagnostic testing identified an intragenic de novo deletion of TRIO in a boy with ID. Targeted sequencing of this gene in over 2300 individuals with ID, identified three additional truncating mutations. All index cases had mild to borderline ID combined with behavioral problems consisting of autistic, hyperactive and/or aggressive behavior. Studies in dissociated rat hippocampal neurons demonstrated the enhancement of dendritic formation by suppressing endogenous TRIO, and similarly decreasing endogenous TRIO in organotypic hippocampal brain slices significantly increased synaptic strength by increasing functional synapses. Together, our findings provide newmechanistic insight into how genetic deficits in TRIO can lead to early neuronal network formation by directly affecting both neurite outgrowth and synapse development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available