4.6 Article

High efficiency emission of a laser based on Yb-doped (Lu,Y)(2)O-3 ceramic

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 182-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.06.006

Keywords

Lasers and laser optics; Laser materials; Lasers; Solid-state; Lasers; Ytterbium; Transparent ceramics

Funding

  1. Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations (FASO Russia) [0389-2016-0002]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [18-03-00649 A]
  3. Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation [02.A03.21.0006]
  4. National Research Council (CNR), Italy (CNR) [SAC.AD002.020.016]
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) (RFBR) [18-53-7815]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrated highly efficient laser emission of a 6% at Yb:(Lu,Y)(2)O-3 ceramic sample with formula (Th0.06Lu0.12Y0.78Zr0.04)(2)O-3 (Le. Yb doped solid solution of Y2O3 and Lu2O3 with Zirconia as sintering aid) fabricated by means of solid-state sintering of mixed sesquioxide nanoparticles under vacuum. The ceramics features a very good optical quality, with a transmission very close to the theoretical limit. The spectroscopic characteristics were investigated, resulting in intermediate properties between Yb:Y2O3 and Yb:Lu2O3. Laser emission was obtained under diode pumping at 936 nm, in CW and quasi-CW pumping condition. We measured a maximum output power of 3.9 W at 1077 nm while the highest slope efficiency was 51.2%, in quasi-CW regime. In CW, at the same laser wavelength, the output power was 2.2 W with a corresponding slope efficiency of 35.1%. The explored range of tunability, 97 nm, is to the best of our knowledge one of the broadest and continuous intervals measured with Yb-doped materials. Mixed Lu-Y ceramic sesquioxides appear then as a promising laser material for broadly tunable laser sources and, in consequence, for the generation of ultrashort laser pulses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available