Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 991-998Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612465878
Keywords
meaning; cognitive processes
Categories
Funding
- Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1249399] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Division Of Human Resource Development
- Direct For Education and Human Resources [1036447] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The experience of meaning is often conceptualized as involving reliable pattern or coherence. However, research has not addressed whether exposure to pattern or coherence influences the phenomenological experience of meaning in life. Four studies tested the prediction that exposure to objective coherence (vs. incoherence) would lead to higher reports of meaning in life. In Studies 1 and 2 (combined N = 214), adults rated photographs of trees presented in patterns (organized around their seasonal content) or randomly. Participants in the pattern conditions reported higher meaning in life than those in the random conditions. Studies 3 and 4 (combined N = 229) yielded similar results when participants read coherent, as opposed to incoherent, linguistic triads. The manipulations did not influence explicit or implicit affect. Implications for understanding the human experience of meaning, the processes that support that experience, and its potential role in adaptation are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available