4.8 Article

Decreased TGFBR3/betaglycan expression enhances the metastatic abilities of renal cell carcinoma cells through TGF-β-dependent and-independent mechanisms

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 37, Issue 16, Pages 2197-2212

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41388-017-0084-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [15H05774, 15K08393]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16J05993]
  3. Yasuda Medical Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08393, 15H05774, 16J05993] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TGF-beta regulates both the tumor-forming and migratory abilities of various types of cancer cells. However, it is unclear how the loss of TGF-beta signaling components affects these abilities in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In this study, we investigated the role of TGFBR3 (TGF-beta type III receptor, also known as betaglycan) in ccRCC. Database analysis revealed decreased expression of TGFBR3 in ccRCC tissues, which correlated with poor prognosis in patients. Orthotopic inoculation experiments using immunocompromised mice indicated that low TGFBR3 expression in ccRCC cells enhanced primary tumor formation and lung metastasis. In the presence of TGFBR3, TGF-beta 2 decreased the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-positive ccRCC cell population, in which renal cancer-initiating cells are enriched. Loss of TGFBR3 also enhanced cell migration in cell culture and induced expression of several mesenchymal markers in a TGF-beta-independent manner. Increased lamellipodium formation by FAK-PI3K signaling was observed with TGFBR3 downregulation, and this contributed to TGF-beta-independent cell migration in ccRCC cells. Taken together, our findings reveal that loss of TGFBR3 endows ccRCC cells with multiple metastatic abilities through TGF-beta-dependent and independent pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available