4.7 Article

A comprehensive study on the seakeeping performance of high speed hybrid ships by 2.5D theoretical calculation and different scaled model experiments

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 197-223

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.051

Keywords

Improved strip theory; 2.5D potential flow theory; Seakeeping performance; Deep-V monohull; Semi-submerged bow (SSB); Tank test; Large-scale model sea trial

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679049]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622696]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, seakeeping performance of vessels is comparatively investigated by means of improved 2.5D theoretical calculation, small-scale model towing tank test and large-scale free running model sea trial. This study also provides a scheme of ship vertical motion stabilization technique by using Semi-Submerged Bow (SSB) appendages. Firstly, an improved strip theory based 2.5D theoretical seakeeping algorithm, which considers the viscous flow effects attributed to bow appendages, is developed to estimate ship vertical motion responses in regular waves. Short-term predictions are also made on the basis of spectral analysis theory to predict ship motion responses in irregular waves. Then corresponding small-scale models are made and tested in a laboratory towing tank for both regular and irregular wave conditions to confirm the numerical results. The tank testing results between different ship schemes are also compared to experimentally investigate the effects of SSB and fin on hull vertical motion stabilization. Furthermore, large-scale model sea trials are conducted in coastal waves for a final validation of the ship seakeeping performance in short-crested sea waves. Finally, comparisons of the results by different testing approaches are systematically made and analyzed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available