4.7 Article

A simplified quasi-static analysis of wave-induced residual liquefaction of seabed around an immersed tunnel

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 574-587

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.049

Keywords

Residual liquefaction; Immersed tunnel; Biot's theory; Porous seabed; Pore-pressure accumulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502285, 51678299, 51409142]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150952]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluation of wave-induced soil response is particularly important for coastal geotechnical engineers involved in the foundation design for marine structures such as immersed tunnels, breakwaters, platforms etc. In this study, a finite element model for the wave-induced soil response around an immersed tunnel is developed, in which the seabed is treated as a porous medium and characterized by Biot's consolidation equations, while the tunnel is considered as a single-phase medium and behaves under a linear elastic law. A new conceptual pore-pressure buildup model is developed to investigate the wave-induced residual liquefaction around the tunnel due to the accumulation of pore pressures under cyclic shearing. The consolidation analysis of seabed foundation under the gravitational forces including the body forces of the structure is pre-assessed and incorporated. It is demonstrated from numerical results that the development of residual pore pressure is asymmetric in nature around the tunnel, which may result in the uneven liquefaction depth and deformation in the seabed near the bottom of the tunnel, thus compromising the stability of the structure. Parametric studies show that wave-induced residual liquefaction is more likely to occur in the shallow seabed with lower relative density and permeability under the wave loading with higher wave height and longer period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available