4.7 Article

A numerical study of water entry of asymmetric wedges using a CIP-based model

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 1-16

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.011

Keywords

Asymmetric water entry; Wedge; Free-falling; CIP method; VOF method; Immersed boundary method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479175, 51679212]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR16E090002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The two-dimensional water entry of wedges with different inclination angles is numerically investigated using a constrained interpolation profile (CIP)-based model, which is developed on the ground of a fixed Cartesian grid and governed by the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations. A high-order finite difference method is employed as the flow solver, where the CIP method is used to discretize the convective term. The tangent of hyperbola for interface capturing/slope weighting (THINC/SW) is adopted to capture the free surface/interface, and an immersed boundary method is applied to simulate the motion of bodies. The present numerical model involving symmetric water entry is verified in comparison with the previous numerical and experimental results in the literature. The results of the asymmetric water entry are provided in terms of the penetration depth, velocity, pile-up coefficients, impact force of wedges, and velocity and pressure distributions of fluid. Considerable attention is paid into the effects of deadrise and inclination angles. It is found that the presence of the inclination angle significantly influences both the velocity and pressure field, and further regulates the penetration depth, velocity, pile-up coefficients, and impact force on the wedge. Specifically, wedges entering into the water with small deadrise angles are found to be more sensitive to the inclination angle than those with large deadrise angle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available