4.7 Article

Developing a dynamic model for pitting and corrosion-fatigue damage of subsea pipelines

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 391-396

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.014

Keywords

Corrosion-fatigue; Probabilistic modelling; Dynamic bayesian network; Subsea pipelines

Funding

  1. National Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamic (NCMEH) at the Australian Maritime College (AMC) of the University of Tasmania
  2. ARC Research Training Centre for Naval Design and Manufacturing (RTCNDM)
  3. University-Industry partnership established under the Australian Research Council Industry Transformation (ARC) [IC140100003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Degradation of subsea pipelines in the presence of corrosive agents and cyclic loads may lead to the failure of these structures. In order to improve their reliability, the deterioration process through pitting and corrosion fatigue phenomena should be considered simultaneously for prognosis. This process starts with pitting nucleation, transits to fatigue damage and leads to fracture and is influenced by many factors such as material and process conditions, each incorporating a high level of uncertainty. This study proposes a novel probabilistic methodology for integrated modelling of pitting and corrosion-fatigue degradation processes of subsea pipelines. The entire process is modelled using a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) methodology, representing its temporal nature and varying growth rates. The model also takes into account the factors influencing each stage of the process. To demonstrate its application, the methodology is applied to estimate the remaining useful life of high strength steel pipelines. This information along with Bayesian updating based on monitoring results can be adopted for the development of effective maintenance strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available