4.3 Article

Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers

Journal

OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 211-214

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqy042

Keywords

3D printing; asthma; respiratory; ultrafine particles; volatile organic compounds

Funding

  1. Centre for Research Expertise in Occupational Diseases - Ontario Ministry of Labour
  2. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto
  3. Centre for Research Expertise in Occupational Disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background 3D printers emit potentially hazardous ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds. Workers using 3D printing technologies may be at risk of respiratory illness from occupational exposure. Aims To assess whether 3D printing is associated with health effects in occupational users. Methods This was a preliminary survey. Workers in 17 companies using 3D printing, including commercial prototyping businesses, educational institutions and public libraries, in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada, were asked to complete survey questionnaires concerning demographic, occupational and health information. Associations between self-reported health history variables and occupational characteristics were examined by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results Among 46 surveyed workers, 27 (59% of participants) reported having respiratory symptoms at least once per week in the past year. Working more than 40 h per week with 3D printers was significantly associated with having been given a respiratory-related diagnosis (asthma or allergic rhinitis) (P < 0.05). We observed a wide variation in occupational hygiene practices in the 17 printing work-places that we surveyed. Conclusions Our finding of frequently reported respiratory symptoms suggests a need for additional studies on exposed workers in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available