4.5 Article

A new resting metabolic rate equation for women with class III obesity

Journal

NUTRITION
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.11.024

Keywords

Resting metabolic rate; Obesity; Body composition; Equation; Women

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/06624-1]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/06624-1] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is an important parameter to guide the nutritional therapy of class III obese patients. The aims of the present study were to develop a predictive equation for RMR estimation in class III obese women using anthropometric indicators and to compare indirect calorimetry with other predictive equations. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on women with class III obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m(2)). Weight, height, fat-free mass, fat mass, and RMR of all individuals were measured. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the new RMR equation and the Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the agreement between indirect calorimetry and the results of predictive equations. Results: We evaluated 101 women with obesity class III and a mean age of 36.3 +/- 10 y. The anthropometric and body composition variables used in the new equation had a coefficient of determination of 0.80, and a significant influence on RMR (P = 0.01). Harris-Benedict and World Health Organization equations showed similar bias and limits (181.6, +2 SD = 765.5, -2 SD = -402.2; 156.4, +2 SD = 799.4, -2 SD = -486.6, respectively). The Mifflin-St Jeor and Owen equations showed large clinical bias (mean, 239.2 and 463.9, respectively), and a tendency to overestimate RMR. Conclusion: The prediction equations tested in the study had low accuracy in estimating RMR of women with class III obesity. However, our equation was developed specifically for this population, using variables known to influence their energy expenditure. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available