4.6 Article

Europeans have a higher proportion of high-frequency deleterious variants than Africans

Journal

HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-015-1604-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP150100583]
  2. Griffith University
  3. Australian Research Council [LP150100583] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that a high proportion of rare variants in European and African populations are deleterious in nature. However, the deleterious fraction of high-frequency variants is unclear. Using more than 6500 exomes we show a much higher fraction (11 %) of relatively high-frequency nonsynonymous (amino acid altering) variants (DAF 0.1-10 %) in European Americans (EA) compared to those from African Americans (AA). In contrast, this difference was only marginal (< 2 %) for low-frequency nonsynonymous variants (DAF < 0.1 %). Our results also revealed that the proportion of high-frequency deleterious nonsynonymous variants in EA was much higher (24 %) than that in AA and this difference was very small (4 %) for the low-frequency deleterious amino acid altering variants. We also show that EA have significantly more number of high-frequency deleterious nonsynonymous variants per genome than AA. The high proportion of high-frequency deleterious variants in EA could be the result of the well-known bottleneck experienced by European populations in which harmful mutations may have drifted to high frequencies. The estimated ages of deleterious variants support this prediction. Our results suggest that high-frequency variants could be relatively more likely to be associated with diseases in Europeans than in Africans and hence emphasize the need for population-specific strategies in genomic medicine studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available