4.8 Article

A fluorescent reporter for quantification and enrichment of DNA editing by APOBEC-Cas9 or cleavage by Cas9 in living cells

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky332

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS [R01 GM118000]
  2. NIAID [R37 AI064046]
  3. NCI [R21 CA206309]
  4. Ministero della Salute [PE-2013-02357669]
  5. NSF-GRFP [00039202]
  6. NIH [T90DE022732]
  7. AIRC [IG-17701]
  8. HHMI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Base editing is an exciting new genome engineering technology. C-to-T mutations in genomic DNA have been achieved using ribonucleoprotein complexes comprised of rat APOBEC1 single-stranded DNA deaminase, Cas9 nickase (Cas9n), uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and guide (g)RNA. Here, we report the first real-time reporter system for quantification of APOBEC-mediated base editing activity in living mammalian cells. The reporter expresses eGFP constitutively as a marker for transfection or transduction, and editing restores functionality of an upstream mCherry cassette through the simultaneous processing of two gRNA binding regions that each contain an APOBEC-preferred 5'TCA target site. Using this system as both an episomal and a chromosomal editing reporter, we show that human APOBEC3A-Cas9n-UGI and APOBEC3B-Cas9n-UGI base editing complexes are more efficient than the original rat APOBEC1-Cas9n-UGI construct. We also demonstrate coincident enrichment of editing events at a heterologous chromosomal locus in reporter edited, mCherry-positive cells. The mCherry reporter also quantifies the double-stranded DNA cleavage activity of Cas9, and may therefore be adaptable for use with many different CRISPR systems. The combination of a rapid, fluorescence-based editing reporter system and more efficient, structurally defined DNA editing enzymes broadens the versatility of the rapidly expanding toolbox of genome editing and engineering technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available