4.5 Article

Renal Phospholipase A(2) Receptor in Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Membranous Nephropathy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4-5, Pages 345-353

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000431331

Keywords

Phospholipase A(2) receptor; Membranous nephropathy; HBV-associated membranous nephropathy

Funding

  1. Health Industry Special Scientific Research Projects, Ministry of Health [201002010]
  2. National Science and Technology Ministry [2011BAI10B05]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81300569]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study examined the expression of renal phospholipase A(2) receptor (PLA(2)R) in idiopathic and secondary membranous nephropathy (MN). Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven MN and non-MN were enrolled. Renal PLA(2)R was examined using an anti-PLA(2)R antibody (anti-PLA(2)RAb), and circulating PLA(2)R-Ab was detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Results: Renal PLA(2)R was detected along the capillary loop in 84% patients with idiopathic MN but not in those with any other primary glomerulonephritis. Only 1 of 38 patients with class V lupus nephritis showed renal PLA(2)R positive. In hepatitis B virus-associated MN (HBV-MN), 64% showed renal PLA(2)R positive, and PLA(2)R overlapped with HBsAg along the capillary loop. In addition, renal PLA(2)R positivity was closely associated with serum PLA(2)R-Ab. Renal PLA(2)R positive was present in all the patients with serum PLA(2)R-Ab positive and in 53% of patients with serum PLA(2)R-Ab negative. However, in patients with renal PLA(2)R negative, serum PLA(2)R-Ab was all negative. Conclusion: Renal biopsy PLA(2)R positivity was common in idiopathic MN and HBV-MN but rare in lupus-associated MN, and it was closely associated with serum PLA(2)R-Ab production. Further studies examining the association between PLA(2)R and HBV-MN may shed light on the mechanism of idiopathic MN or HBV-MN. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available