4.3 Article

Search strategies for pair production of heavy Higgs bosons decaying invisibly at the LHC

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
Volume 929, Issue -, Pages 171-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.02.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CONICET
  2. ANPCyT [PICT-2013-2266]
  3. VIEP-BUAP (Mexico)
  4. CONACYT-SNI (Mexico)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The search for heavy Higgs bosons at the LHC represents an intense experimental program, carried out by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations, which includes the hunt for invisible Higgs decays and dark matter candidates. No significant deviations from the SM backgrounds have been observed in any of these searches, imposing significant constraints on the parameter space of different new physics models with an extended Higgs sector. Here we discuss an alternative search strategy for heavy Higgs bosons decaying invisibly at the LHC, focusing on the pair production of a heavy scalar Htogether with a pseudoscalar A, through the production mode q (q) over bar -> Z* -> HA. We identify as the most promising signal the final state made up of 4b(+) EmissT, coming from the heavy scalar decay mode H -> hh -> b (b) over barb (b) over bar, with h being the discovered SM-like Higgs boson with mh= 125 GeV, together with the invisible channel of the pseudoscalar. We work within the context of simplified MSSM scenarios that contain quite heavy sfermions of most types with O(10) TeVmasses, while the stops are heavy enough to reproduce the 125GeV mass for the lightest SM-like Higgs boson. By contrast, the gauginos/ higgsinos and the heavy MSSM Higgs bosons have masses near the EW scale. Our search strategies, for a LHC center-of-mass energy of root s= 14 TeV, allow us to obtain statistical significances of the signal over the SM backgrounds with values up to similar to 1.6 sigma and similar to 3 sigma, for total integrated luminosities of 300 fb(-1) and 1000 fb(-1), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available