4.4 Article

Neutron Spectroscopy for pulsed beams with frame overlap using a double time-of-flight technique

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.09.051

Keywords

Neutron spectroscopy; Deuteron breakup; Foil activation analysis; Time-of-flight

Funding

  1. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration through the Nuclear Science and Security Consortium [DE-NA0000979, DE-NA0003180]
  2. University of California [12-LR-238745]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF 11-582]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344, DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new double time-of-flight (dTOF) neutron spectroscopy technique has been developed for pulsed broad spectrum sources with a duty cycle that results in frame overlap, where fast neutrons from a given pulse overtake slower neutrons from previous pulses. Using a tunable beam at the 88-Inch Cyclotron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, neutrons were produced via thick-target breakup of 16 MeV deuterons on a beryllium target in the cyclotron vault. The breakup spectral shape was deduced from a dTOF measurement using an array of EJ-309 organic liquid scintillators. Simulation of the neutron detection efficiency of the scintillator array was performed using both GEANT4 and MCNP6. The efficiency-corrected spectral shape was normalized using a foil activation technique to obtain the energy-dependent flux of the neutron beam at zero degrees with respect to the incoming deuteron beam. The dTOF neutron spectrum was compared to spectra obtained using HEPROW and GRAVEL pulse height spectrum unfolding techniques. While the unfolding and dTOF results exhibit some discrepancies in shape, the integrated flux values agree within two standard deviations. This method obviates neutron time-of-flight spectroscopy challenges posed by pulsed beams with frame overlap and opens new opportunities for pulsed white neutron source facilities. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available