4.4 Article

Construction and performance of the barrel electromagnetic calorimeter for the GlueX experiment

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.04.006

Keywords

Electromagnetic calorimeter; Sampling calorimeter; Scintillating fibers; Silicon photomultipliers; MPPC; GlueX

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics Division [DE-AC05-06OR23177]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [SAPPJ-2015-00024]
  3. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER41374, DE-FG02-87ER40315]
  4. Chilean Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica grant [ACT-1413]
  5. BASAL grant [FB-0821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The barrel calorimeter is part of the new spectrometer installed in Hall D at Jefferson Lab for the GlueX experiment. The calorimeter was installed in 2013, commissioned in 2014 and has been operating routinely since early 2015. The detector configuration, associated Monte Carlo simulations, calibration and operational performance are described herein. The calorimeter records the time and energy deposited by charged and neutral particles created by a multi-GeV photon beam. It is constructed as a lead and scintillating-fiber calorimeter and read out with 3840 large-area silicon photomultiplier arrays. Particles impinge on the detector over a wide range of angles, from normal incidence at 90 degrees down to 11.5 degrees, which defines a geometry that is fairly unique among calorimeters. The response of the calorimeter has been measured during a running experiment and performs as expected for electromagnetic showers below 2.5 GeV. We characterize the performance of the BCAL using the energy resolution integrated over typical angular distributions for pi(0) and eta production of sigma(E)/E = 5.2%/root E (GeV) circle plus 3.6% and a timing resolution of sigma = 150 ps at 1 GeV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available